Shouldn’t schools teach something like, oh, the difference between a fact and a myth? Shouldn’t the schools that teach teachers, maybe teach the teachers something other than the science of feelgoodology and self-esteemics? Maybe the teachers could be taught how to teach the difference between facts and erroneous beliefs.
Of course it must be comforting to think that there are other ways of knowing, other paths to certainty, other than doing the hard work of observing, testing, and measuring, verifying, cross-checking and just plain following up. But there just aren’t. And belief doesn’t make it so.
And it would be pretty to think that people who publish information should feel some sense of kinship with facts, should feel embarassed if they participate in the communication of improbable beliefs and thereby add to the world’s growing fund of stupid. At least journalists, investigators, or academics should try to avoid inserting their own wishful thinking into places where truth should be.
But they don’t. Either they don’t care, or they don’t think their audience will care, or more likely they don’t think their audience will know the difference, or even worse, they flat don’t know the difference themselves.
You can’t interview three people on the street at random, obtain two opinions, then report, in a well-groomed baritone, “There is widespread disagreement about . . .. Back to you in the studio.”
You can’t report that self-styled psychics are helping the police in a crime investigation, and not bother to follow up to say that everything the psychics said was demonstrably untrue and misleading.
It’s not science if an environmentalist reports that bacteria live on toilet seats. They are small, completely white, and will can sometimes entirely cover a toilet seat in public restrooms. (If you see a black toilet seat, it’s not bacteria. That would be a virus.)
That’s why, if you are looking for information, the world wide web should be thought of as the home of a million lies. And that’s why schools should teach b.s. avoidance skills. Even the b.s. broadcast by true believers. Maybe even especially b.s. broadcast by true believers.
It isn’t all that hard. Often, verbal “flags” signal the near presence of nonsense. For example, any sentence introduced by the word, “Dude,” is likely to be stupid.
The observation that experts [doctors, science, physicists, insert your choice] don’t know everything or any particular thing , does not turn an otherwise stupid statement into a smart statement.
Self-evidently stupid beliefs are not actually secret information suppressed by powerful conspiracies profiting by keeping the people perpetually ignorant of the truth. Those who remain perpetually ignorant require no outside conspiracy to achieve their happy ignorant condition. No help is required.
But if you are buying, there’s a lot of people willing to sell.